(prime mover debate) please provide good counter argument (please read details)?

A universe is statistically improbable based on its complexity, but a god capable of creating a universe is statistically more improbable because "god" is more complex than a universe. it is statistically improbable for the laws and constants of the universe to be compatible with life, but a god capable of calculating the "goldilocks values" would be statistically more improbable than the finely tuned combination itself. an all powerful, all knowing god capable of creating a universe from nothing is not simple, but infinitely complicated. natural or supernatural, if something exists, it is subject to statistical probability. a singularity is void of complication, so it is the most probable state to first exist, and it reduces complexity completely. a singularity is an empty void of nothingness. lacking space, time, matter, LAWS AND PROPERTIES OF REALITY, making a singularity prone to uncertainties, therefore anything is possible in a singularity. so something (like something simple that could give rise to a universe) needs no cause to come from a singularity. a universe isn't infinitely complicated, the universe is fundamentally nothing and its laws and constants are fundamentally simple. we do not directly observe something coming from nothing but we also do not directly observe a god.